Both the Northern and Southern Hemisphere have nearly the same amount
of bright stars and both have bright constellations in the shape of a cross,
but what does our hemisphere's night sky have that the Southern Hemisphere's
doesn't?
Yesterday, March 20, was the first day of spring in the Northern Hemisphere,
and the first day of autumn in the Southern Hemisphere. The Sun is just
about directly above the Tropic of Cancer at noon now - the Sun rises
with the constellation of Cancer the Crab.
At
night, in the Northern Hemisphere, the spring time constellations are
taking the stage as the winter constellations are exiting, stage right.
Leo the Lion, Virgo the Virgin, and Bootes the Herdsman are all dominant
in the eastern sky before midnight. At the same time, Orion, Canis Major,
Auriga, and Taurus are sinking toward the western horizon In a few months,
the prominent summer constellation including Lyra, Aquilla and the Northern
Cross (Cygnus the Swan) will make their claim on the eastern horizon.
In
the mid latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere, you can still see Canis
Major and Orion. If you recall from our question in January, Orion pretty
much straddles the Celestial Equator - it's visible in both hemispheres.
However, you might notice that Orion looks a bit different. It's upside
down from the perspective of a viewer in Argentina or Australia - the
sword lies above the familiar 3-stars in a row belt. Not only are Orion
and Canis Major easy to spot, but the constellations of the zodiac such
as Taurus, Gemini, Leo, and Virgo are all visible too. Leo, Bootes and
Virgo can be seen now in the Southern Hemisphere, in the early evening,
rising in the northeast. At the same time, the bright constellations of
Centaur and the Southern Cross (Crux) ride high in the southeastern sky.
Of
course there are things observers in the Southern Hemisphere can see that
we can't here north of the Equator and vise-versa. For instance, the Southern
Hemisphere has the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, two satellite galaxies
of our Milky Way galaxy, which are visible on most clear, moonless nights
throughout the year. These "clouds" are circumpolar meaning
that, although they rotate across the sky, for people living south of
about 40 degrees south latitude, they're close enough to the South Celestial
Pole so that they never quite dip below the horizon. Rather, they appear
to circle the pole throughout the year, The Southern Cross and Centaurus
are also both circumpolar constellations. Therefore, in the mid latitudes
of the Northern Hemisphere, we can't see them.
If
you live at 40 degrees north latitude, and if you have an unobstructed
view of the southern horizon, it's theoretically possible to see a star
that would be overhead for someone at 50 degrees south latitude (40 +
50 = 90). From our view, such a star would be kissing the horizon. If
we lived on a planet with no atmosphere, it would be possible to see a
star lying on the horizon, but our atmosphere is too dense to permit viewing
of stars closer than about 5 degrees to the horizon - too much starlight
is scattered and absorbed by the atmosphere. Anyway, the point is, just
because we're in the Northern Hemisphere, it doesn't mean we can't see
stars in the Southern Hemisphere. We just can't see the ones that are
more than about 80 degrees or so of our latitude.
Of
course, the Northern Hemisphere has circumpolar constellations too. However,
our circumpolar constellations (at about 40 degrees north latitude) are
feeble compared to the ones in the Southern Hemisphere. In the Northern
Hemisphere, there are 5 circumpolar constellations; Ursa Major (the Big
Dipper), Ursa Minor (the Little Dipper), Cephus (the King), Cassiopeia
(the Queen), and (Draco the Dragon). Not a single one of the stars in
any of these constellations is considered to be a very bright star (first
order magnitude or brighter). Sure, the Big Dipper is easy to identify,
and 5 of the 7 stars of the dipper are relatively bright second order
magnitude stars, but all-in-all, the northern sky is rather devoid of
light. By contrast, in the Southern Hemisphere, there are 11 constellations
which are circumpolar and 6 first order magnitude stars!
So
what is it that the Northern Hemisphere has that the Southern Hemisphere
doesn't. The answer is a "pole star." Polaris or the North Star
is nearly directly above the North Pole (it's actually about 1 degree
away from the celestial pole). You might think that with all of the stars
in the sky, it shouldn't be that unusual for a given star to rest above
the pole, but really, it's an extremely unlikely occurrence. It's even
more unlikely that our pole star would be relatively bright - second order
magnitude. If you divided the night sky into squares that are one degree
latitude by one degree longitude in size, there would be 41,253 square
degrees in our night sky. There are approximately 2,000 stars that we
can see on the clearest night, and perhaps 6,000 different stars are visible
to us throughout the year, but only 50 of these are as bright or brighter
than Polaris. The chances of a star like Polaris occupying a place over
the pole are about slim indeed - about 1 in 1,000. Nevertheless, Polaris
defies the odds and has become our guiding light.
Inhabitants
of the Southern Hemisphere can't see Polaris, even if they just live one
degree south of the Equator, and they don't have a pole star they can
call their own. There's nothing even close to the South Pole. A couple
of faint stars are about 10 degrees from the South Pole, but the nearest
star of equivalent brightness to Polaris is nearly 15 degrees from the
pole.
Finding
Polaris is a snap. You can simply use the "pointer stars" in
the bowl of the Big Dipper to point the way. However, trying to locate
the spot in the night sky over the South Pole is a chore. For someone
in South Africa, for instance, it's first necessary to find south. The
Southern Cross can be used for this purpose. The northern most and southern
most stars in this 4 star constellation points toward the South Pole.
To zero in on the actual location of the spot above the South Pole, a
line can be drawn from the first order magnitude star, Canopus, to the
line extending south from the Southern Cross. Canopus can be found to
the lower right or southeast of the Southern Cross and is about the same
distance to the pole as is the cross. These two lines intersect at an
approximately 90 degree angle (right angle) and fairly close to the South
Pole.
Knowing
the direction of the either pole nowadays is basically an academic exercise,
but before it was understood that clocks and sextants could be used for
establishing your latitude and longitude, mariners and explorers often
relied on old Polaris. The height of the North Star above the horizon
is equal to your latitude. Of course, compasses point to the north, but
they point toward the geomagnetic pole and not toward the true geographic
pole. In some cases, such as in the central US, there's very little offset
between these two, but depending upon where you are in the Northern Hemisphere,
the offset can be considerable. For example, from England, there's approximately
a 45 degree difference between true north and geomagnetic north - geomagnetic
north is in a northwest direction from the British Isles.
The
North Star isn't just a run-of-the-mill star in terms of its size either.
It's huge, and it shines with the light of about 1,600 Suns. The only
reason it isn't brighter is because it's so far away - 600 light years.
Polaris and the Sun are now about as close to each other as they'll ever
get. Alas, all good things must come to an end, and in a few centuries,
Polaris will drift away from it's current heralded post to a location
carrying much less esteem, somewhere to the south of where it is now.
If it's any consolation, Polaris will return to the pole again but not
for another 20,000 thousand years.
For more about the North Star see the book Secrets of the Night Sky by
Bob Berman. Also see, last year's question about the Big Dipper (May,
2001).
|